When Vulnerability Beats Professional Distance — What I Learned In “The Camp”.
Professional psychology still widely teaches that the therapist should remain neutral, emotionally non-participatory, and minimally self-revealing. This model argues that distance protects the clinical frame
Professional psychology still widely teaches that the therapist should remain neutral, emotionally non-participatory, and minimally self-revealing.

This model argues that distance protects the clinical frame and maintains “clean” transference dynamics.
Last weekend, I made a different choice.
I attended a men’s retreat together with three of my own clients.
Most traditional therapists would never do that — or would actively forbid it.
Yet for us, this shared experience wasn’t a disruption.
It deepened trust.
Healing is not only created through interpretation or cognitive insight.
Men often heal most through embodied presence, resonance, shared struggle, shared breath, and unarmoured humanity.
Inside that circle, I wasn’t the detached analytic observer.
I was a man doing his own work — wrestling, opening, grieving, releasing, learning.
My clients saw that.
They saw me in process, not above it.
This is not boundary collapse.
This is boundary re-imagination.
Less therapist as blank wall.
More therapist as fellow human — walking alongside.
That subtle shift changes the emotional texture of the relationship:
more real contact, more truth, more dignity, more permission, more safety to reveal.
Not because the therapist stays perfect — but because the therapist stays human.
Some paradigms call this “contamination.”
I call it relational courage.
And in our case — it worked.
It brought depth that no couch could have generated by itself, it brought brotherhood.
—
Photo: Andras Turi / All Male Area

